I agree with “me.” I think Sun Sign compatibility can be searched for with abundant results on the internet and there is an entire section dedicated to Sun Sign compatibility on the forum for personal advice and discussion. It seems that readers can get a general feel for the different qualities of the signs to piece together the compatibility portion by themselves–without an astrologer. What would be interesting are more specific placements. As far as synastry goes, I personally would like to read about house overlays, effects of asteroids, what marks spiritual compatibility/connections, or what marks I-hate-you-and-can’t-get-along-with-you-but-I-must-be-with-you connections. It’s hard to find quality information of that nature on the web or even in the book stores I’ve visited. Whatever the case is, it’s important, I feel, to provide information that provides insight into the deeper, psychological underpinnings of some astrological things that aren’t available on the web (especially since this is where I’m assuming most of the members get their information). When deciding if something should be posted, I feel it’s important to determine two things: can it be easily searched for on the web and can readers understand the concept easily? I mean, one example is this. I had been searching for valuable insight on Mars in Pisces for the longest, and I found the only satisfying description here on this site! (I soon found others in books, but still!)

anyways, were was I ?

Oh yeah.

What would be really interesting is to use
the woman’s sun sign and the man’s moon sign.

What would be re

I think this is a case of not being able to satisfy everyone all the time. There are many different levels of knowledge among readers. If I write for advanced readers then newbies won’t understand. If I write for newbies, advanced readers might get bored. I think the only solution is to mix it up.