So which do I take? The moment we actually clicked, or the moment we first nodded at each other as we took out our garbage cans (we were neighbours)? Another reason I don’t put a great deal of stock into “first meetings” – it is true that some meetings are phenomenal, but most are mundane until something clicks – like, the real “right moment”.

I question because sometimes I get comission online and I never actually see the person.

So hmm.

So I guess me and you will never have a first meeting chart, for we’ve only exchanged resources intellectually; we never “met”?

how do u guys ask though? even my best friends think im weird when i ask for the exact minute and town of their birth..maybe if i werent so demanding and neurotic lol. i can only imagine getting this info by playing eccentric. i need to work on being more of a smoothie

Not true. Not that I have a lot of stellar luck, but I didn’t need The Magi to tell me that. The relationship is as good as one could hope to have, excluding the external pressures.

I know my own natal chart, I know my partner’s natal chart, and from there I can have an excellent understanding about our relationship. Horary isn’t my bag, but I will listen to someone whose bag it is, certainly. I’m still not a believer that the moment in time when someone meets determines the nature of the relationship.

I will agree with the statement that the “First Meeting” moment can give clues to why you might have come together, but it doesn’t determine the fate of the relationship, as the Magi profess. At least, not in my experience – and believe me, I’m happy I ignored it.

which is why some people avoid it

Meeting via the internet can be deceiving. It is like watching the Christmas yuletide log burning on the TV set. It gives you a good idea of the real thing but it isn’t the real thing. You’ll never get warm by a painted fire. But at least you can hope to get near one and imagine how warm it can be, which is better than nothing.

I don’t think technology is a good substitute for the five senses of the natural physical body. It is a good tool for communicating thoughts and ideas, but the invisible man leaves much to be desired. So imho it has to be the moment of real genuine actual intercourse. (and I don’t mean sex)

And the person can be persistent as in, ‘why can’t this relationship be the way I envisioned it, blahblahblahblah, I want it to match my idea of perfect love.’

I hope I make sense, because I had about 6 hours of graphic designing project for a client.

My question is, if a person meets another on the internet, for example, by dropping someone an email, then later meets them in real life, what is the exact meeting chart? The first internet chat or the real face-to-face encounter?

His on mine, mine on his. For whatever purpose there is to this relationship, it will magnify our mutual destinies in that big bold benevolent Jupiter way. He is good for me, and I for him.

Perhaps not in the romantic sense, but overall in the grand scheme of things?

I felt uplifted in his presence and he in mine. And yet at times very torn down because of that severe Grand Cross and the huge T-square in the composite.

Yes, astrology is real. These are not mere coincidences. And when you glance at the charts with any degree of familiarity, the key issues jump out of the paper. The more time I spend studying this fascinating ancient science the more I stand amazed.